Skip to main content

Its all GAS!

Addicts of the world unite - Apple Corporation has fleetingly become the largest company in the world based on market capitalization. Keyword fleetingly. ExxonMobil is traditionally the other one that has held that title. Market cap is defined as total shares otustanding times the market value of the share. This is merely a reflection of what investors view the worth of the business to be. Now Apple has not had a run up out of that zone where it barely scraped Exxon for the top slot - a mere reflection of being too big to grow based on an earlier high water mark (or high Gas Mark)! Though on closer inspection it appears there are some similarities betwixt the two. Both are commodities that people now find hard to leave their home without. It is omnipresent where you look - and is addictive. People need to speed on the blacktop as much as the information highway and this speed (some drugs were actually called that) need is satiated with both these products. But if only people slow down and chill they realize that they were merely running in circles or getting ahead of everyone to the next red light. Economies of Peru and Venezuela today run on other addictive substances that can kill. The net benefits of the Apple and Exxon products although more useful and somewhat less threatening also tend to have the same effect as getting people to pay premiums and want it every living moment. If drugs were made legal - which they should be - South American countries might have the highest valued companies in the world. Among many benefits will be that weak people who can succumb to halucinogenic chemicals will get easy access and depart soon without causing undue harm to society. Fortune will have to rewrite its top 100 list completely rather than compare the fruit and the Gas company all the time. So its all Gas at the end of the day.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more