Skip to main content

Scandal and Pelham

Curious title because it is.  Pelham refers to none other than one of my fave authors P.G. Wodehouse.  That his career took off has something to do with an officer that gave him his first jobs at the HSBC or Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.  In part because his pop (PG's not the officer's) who was a HK magistrate pulled some proverbial strings (may be they were on his robe or his hat that he wore when on the job).

The very bank at the heart of a recent price fixing/financial mumbo jumbo scandal as reported by a newspaper called the Guardian (feel good newspaper run by the Brits no less).  I researched this interesting tale further and came upon published propaganda material from HSBC that goes as follows -


Wodehouse’s career with the bank was short-lived and far from glittering; and yet memorable for all concerned. In his first year he was late for work on 20 days (excluding ‘foggy mornings’, which did not count) - a number only exceeded by two of his 56 contemporaries!  

Whilst working for the bank, Plum began to develop his literary career. During his time at Lombard Street he wrote short stories, articles, lyrics, poems and jokes for dozens of magazines which were then trading in London. In 1902 he decided to take the plunge, leaving the bank to become a full-time writer.
 
As to his daily banking work, he later admitted in a memoir for HSBC’s staff magazine that:

‘‘If there was a moment in the course of my banking career when I had the remotest notion of what it was all about, I am unable to recall it. From Fixed Deposits I drifted to Inward Bills - no use asking me what Inward Bills are, I never found out….. My total inability to grasp what was going on made me something of a legend in the place.’’

He came up with a number of characters during this time and went on to publish what are now famous works.
 

Does not rank up there with Iran Contra or Snowden but is an interesting tale nonetheless - one surely the crumpets would have devoured over tea.

Comments

  1. Einstein is also supposed to have survived a mundane job- relatively speaking!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...