Skip to main content

Xmas by the Bay

It was the day J C arrived.  2,017 years ago or so some believe.  And since then the devout have ensured it is remembered across this planet as a day to party.  For us it is a time to take a break from work.  Enjoy as a family.  Usually out and about a place we have never seen.  This time a staycation.  A made up yuppie name to indicate we were with in shouting distance of our abode yet keeping up with the enjoyment part.

With no familial obligations and tree cutting or decorating or other chores to attend to we went to San Francisco to check out the merriment by the bay.  The day was a crisp but partly cloudy affair.  Temps were pleasant in the fifties.

The transit to and fro surprisingly not too crowded.  We got to ride the ancient Cable Cars without much waiting  - the trick is to take it from just outside the Embarcadero BART off California and not go to Powell street. 



The latter is always crowded - the line to get on is an hour long.  At California and Drumm it is immediate boarding and a view as it climbs Nob Hill.

Where we encountered our first sights.  Tony Bennett cast in bronze greets visitors at the Fairmont.


Tony digs at the summit, this hotel has a gingerbread affair in their lobby to entertain guests young and old.

From there we basically went downhill taking in more lobbies decked out in festive glory.  Stopped a bit at the ice rink in Union Square and then rode the elevator of the adjacent Westin to see the same from 40 stories up.  Oh what fun!

Salesforce Tower looms large like a steel and glass behemoth - newest addition to the SF skyline

Cider and cookies to warm us along the way we made it through China town and finally ended at the Fisherman's Wharf for some sourdough and Crab Cakes.


Rode a Milan like tram back to BART.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...