Skip to main content

Inside Job - 2010 film

Written and directed by Academy award winner Charles Ferguson this documentary about the 2008 financial crisis that rocked the world will do the same to your metabolism.

Charles is a thinker, and astute individual with degrees from MIT and Berkeley who has cranked out provocative films.  This one through its poignant narrative and interviews with some of the key members complicit in the making of the crisis will leave you shaking.

Shaking in anger, disbelief and pure fear at the levels of corruption and immorality that plagues the highest echelons of government, academia and finance.  To say that not much has changed since that day of rude awakening is an understatement.

Michael Douglas' character stated way back in 1987 "Greed for lack of a better word is good".  That world view is what propelled America from its status as a colony of 13 states to a vibrant economy that is the world's envy.  However, greed unchecked and unfettered by any form of regulation and oversight and manipulated by a select few can unleash havoc that is equally stunning.  Fabricating financial engineering models versus tangible engineered products like buildings or farming equipment or bridges can only create an asset bubble.  By definition a bubble bursts.

When the party is going strong and the music is playing it is hard for the partygoers to quit.  When the music does stop and there are no chairs left to sit on they experience the hard landing.  Oddly the wealthy and powerful have a safety net and can go on to luxuriate in their backup chairs while those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder find themselves hurting in the behind after the hard fall.  While ignorance is no excuse for bad borrowing habits there is a point in the film that talks to the duplicitous behavior exhibited by Wall Street banks controlling the levers that set policy to favor their profits and therefore bonuses earned.

A chilling but must see documentary that can give 'The Exorcist' a run for its money and prove that truth is scarier than fiction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...