Skip to main content

If Aristotle used emojis


Modern day life has brought many a convenience to us humans.  A toaster to toast a piece of bread by merely pressing a button or a steaming cup of caffeine with the press of another button.  And that is just to start our day.

Our entire existence now has become subject to multiple button pressing activity, least of which is the incessant banter between two or more individuals of our species using the manifold tech available to us.

Communication therefore has transformed from what used to be a difficult exercise in millennia past and now more so become central to our (perceived) success as a civilization occupying this rock.

I would argue how and what we choose to communicate in today’s day and age are immensely important to our future survival.  The POTUS presenting a point of view about a deadly pathogen and its impact to society vs a trained immunologist articulating what we as a society need to do for self-preservation brings it home to many of us.

The very definition of communication though begs some scrutiny.  It is variously defined as:
  •         The imparting or exchanging of information or news or
  •          Means of sending or receiving information, such as telephone lines or computers

According to the Aristotelian Teleology (the explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve rather than of the cause by which they arise) we need to pay attention to what communication provides rather than why and how it originates.

The contradiction to that however is the idea that our modern conveniences now allow many of us to use shorthand to get the “messaging” across to another of our kind or not.

If emojis (graphic images that serve as a short hand for human emotion and thought) can convey the same idea instead of a whole sentence then it serves the sender and receiver the purpose of saving time and energy it might take to type out a whole sentence.

But then again if that is true and the ilk of Aristotelian era had resorted to punching out similes on papyrus would the treatises have been as profound as they are viewed by our ilk now?

Would they amount to awarding a bagful of PhD degrees to scores of scholars?  Are we as a species better off or worse with those writings to look back on and not a bunch of symbols?

In that vein I have always wondered whether Michelangelo would have been better at his work if he had Autodesk on his table before he set out to carve the Pieta?  Or was there a fundamental human X factor that held Leonardo’s brush when he finished the Mona Lisa?

While we have been able to use tech to put men on the moon and do deep cellular research into our human body, aided by fascinating scientific advances enabled by advanced communication, we have not seen much if any modern day Pietas being chiseled either.

Do any of us crave more of that type of expression or communication anymore?

Are we better off knowing that Aristotle did not use emojis? 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A few good books

 On an informal mission to read one book a week as long as the eyes allow for such ambition. Fiction or non is not important as long as it entertains and /or educates. To that end the past few weeks have brought a bounty in the form of some wonderful and then not so engaging literature. Among the notables are - Non fiction category: 1. Good arguments by Bo Seo (how to handle a dispute or debate the most efficient way possible) 2. Genesis by Eric Schmidt (and former US Secy of State Henry Kissinger, who recently passed) - how AI might affect our lives as we know it 3. One in a billion - Zarna Garg (an autobiographical look at an Indian born American woman with a bindi narrated in a standup format - yes it is at times cliched but still funny) Fiction: 1. Personal by Lee Child (a vigilante story with Jack Reacher the giant, nomad protagonist of Child's novels goes hunting for a sniper) 2. Ramayana unraveled by Ami Ganatra (she might disagree about it being a work of fiction but oh wel...

Back in DC

This time for a tech conference in the realm of what else? AI. But applied to an oft neglected space called Knowledge Management. The latter is a community of practice that focuses on analyzing, organizing and making available reams of data that have been gathered over time by various functions within an organization for anyone in the company to utilize. This function or process is ripe for applying AI agents (or agentic AI framework) and optimize for better outcomes. It was informative. More rewarding was getting acquainted with folks who practice this craft as well as learning of what they see in the corporate or public sectors. Since the venue was Washington DC it also afforded me the chance to take evening strolls albeit the weather was trying. With wind chill in the single digit it still is a glamorous place to perambulate through history absorbing what this country has been through since its founding days. I was able to visit the place Lincoln was killed along with his monument t...

Costa Rica

 Our first foray into Central America. That elongated isthmus that forms the geographic boundary between two vast continents of North and South America. Specifically landing for NYE 2026 in San Jose, Costa Rica. Capital city for this region that does not have its own army, instead relying on its big bro the Estados Unidos to the north is a metropolis of approx. 500K people. Largely wilderness and with both a Pacific and Carribean/Atlantic coast the country is rich in bio diversity. In Spanish it means the rich coast so named by Columbus landing in early 16th century and being mesmerized by the local tribes sporting gold jewelry.   Our stay included visiting the foothills of a large strato volcano called Arenal and enjoying the naturally heated thermal baths for a while.  Lunching amidst lush forest and watching indigenous species of avian noise makers fly overhead. Toucans, some sort of pea hens, multiple song bird species completed the spectacle. Iguanas and a lonel...