Skip to main content

Brands

 Since modern man started roaming the planet he has obsessed with the idea of brand.  It is a representation of oneself, whether a single entity or a collective.

Humans with their ego like to have a way to identify with something and a brand helps them do so.

Large governments are brands that people know about and can easily associate by virtue of the country's flag for example.  The flag is the brand.  Or their money.  Also called Fiat (not the car although that is an example of a brand) it represents the stored value that can be easily exchanged for goods and services.

The first major birthing of private sector branding came about with the creation of the British East India Company circa 1600. A private enterprise with a sole aim of garnering and maximizing revenues from the jewel in its colonial crown, India.  They looted and plundered under various CEOs or its equivalent titles and the world knew what the East India Company meant then and now.

The Dutch copied that model and created their own version during their conquests in Asia.  Later came the industrial revolution and the creation of many a brand that are still known today.  Family names became brands.  Partly to ensure the legacy of the name continued and partly it was easy to find a brand name.  Who wants to hire a consultant (not in those days) to come up with some cockamamie story and branding?

Thus the Ford and Tata were born.  These names transcend geographies and are known globally.  And they do so over the ravages of time.  Not all things good come from the brands that people have come to know. One might remember the fiascos that Ford has had over the years and many a dismal business outcome with the Tatas.  But the brands have something more.  A resiliency to them.  It is shown in a balance sheet as Goodwill.

Then the information revolution or the electronics and telco revolution happened.  Interbrand actually tracks these brands for their value and has Apple, Google, McDonald's and Coke as some of the most valued brands in the world.

But how does one come up with brand names these days?  I for one am always baffled.

I have read quite a few stories about many of them but what gets me is the ones that are beyond any logic and yet are pushed and peddled by their owners on unsuspecting and gullible denizens.

Take everyday items like soaps and shampoos.  The world is awash in them.  Yet do you oft wonder if Irish Spring would have been less zesty if it was called Turkish Spring?  Or Zambian?  I know Fiji water has some cachet.  I mean first of all what the heck is an Irish Spring?  Why not just spring for 'Spring' signifying fragrance for a washing accouterment?

Then there is something called 'Pantene'.  Whoa.  Reminds me of panties.  And is that a good thing?  I don't know about you but these people need to be sat down and whacked on their noggin.  Just because you have tons of marketing budgets to burn does not mean you dish out any nonsense.  I mean Dial it down.  Yeah right  - Dial is also a soap.  LOL.

If this makes you crazy think of those drugs you need to consume to calm the heck down.  Americans are loaded.  With legally sold drugs.  Each a tongue twister to address ailments that range from a variety of anxieties, to heart and blood medication to malfunctioning genitalia (esp penis related), and finally a vast array of rashes and fungal growth in parts unknown.

So you have your Xanax and your Otezla.  You could also get a Zoloft or an Entyvio and a Humira.  Or you could choose between Mylanta and Viagra depending on which part of the anatomy needed fixin.

Just when I thought that the last few letters of the alphabet had no use and could be retired the pharmas jumped on this unused section and had a field day.  All of a sudden the typographers had found use for their unused blocks and were fast printing crap for consumers to read with plenty of X, Y, Zs.

That is branding for you folks and hope you know what to do with it.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...