Skip to main content

Burn After Reading - Coen Brothers Film

Impossible.  Drivel.  Ridiculous.  Many ways one can define the plot of this hilarious Coen Brothers film, that they wrote, edited, produced and directed.

The title suggests something top secret which the movie reveals it is not.   Far from it.  It is in fact garbage - well it is the memoir that a low security clearance analyst has started to pen after he quits his job at the CIA.  His director invites him for a sit down and basically fires him citing his drinking problem.  The analyst is played by the amazing John Malkovich who through out the film displays his uncanny sense of being a frustrated and pissed off individual.  He plays that part amazingly well.

His wife is screwing George Clooney's character behind his back.  Clooney's character is an ex Marshall who works in Treasury and is paranoid of being followed by operatives who suspect his affairs.  Turns out his wife is spying on him having an affair of her own.

So everyone involved in the film is basically an adulterer except Malkovich, who simply views the world as a league of morons.  That much is fact.  Really.

Everything else that happens in the film is improbable and ludicrous but the cast pulls an amazing performance including Brad Pitt as a semi retarded gym instructor that gets fatally shot by Clooney's character towards the end in a case of mistaken identity.

Frances McDormand adds her Midwestern charm as another bumbling and inadequate woman who is Brad's colleague in a gym.  Together they scheme an idea to extort money from Malkovich for returning a draft of his memoir they get their hands on accidentally.  They assume the draft to be a top secret document.

The story is tightly woven while being completely silly and in the end the CIA director and his supervisor agree that they learned nothing from what happened and that the whole thing is a mystery.

Sound familiar?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...