Skip to main content

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right.

Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong.

At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future.

Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong.

He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it was not until Sir Isaac Newton described it eloquently with the falling apple example 400 years ago we were clueless as to why rocks or any object falls downward to earth.  That said we now believe with 100% certainty that it is gravity that is holding us down as we drive from SF to LA or eventually our flight to Tokyo lands.  But what if?

What if our present understanding of gravity is wrong?

What if our understanding of time is wrong?

And so on.

What life might look like another 400 years from now is anyone's guess and there is a high likelihood that those guesses will be wrong.  In part because they are formed with our fixed understanding of what we know to be fact today.  So the notion of gravity is highly likely to be different too.  It was not what we believe now to be true a mere 400 years ago for all of civilization which is much older than that.

In a similar argument an earlier book I read about what makes genius genius, the author observes that such attribute is often assigned to a person after the fact, later in time not when the person is actually performing their best work.  Hindsight has a better success rate than foresight.

Ideas, space, people all change.  Some of the largest commercial successes are businesses that hold no inventory, a concept foreign just a couple decades ago.  Facebook, Uber or Google who other than owning a few buildings to house their staff own no tangible product yet are worth billions of dollars.  Their whole existence is built on the promise of new ideas and ways to make life friction-less.  Some simply aim to provide you more free time.

Today more than ever a man becomes a woman and vice versa.  At least there is growing acceptance and possibility for those that want their gender reassigned.  It is how we view our world that has to change.

Donald Trump just might be POTUS!

PS: some thoughts expressed in this blog are mine and bear no resemblance to what is in the book -  unless you can disprove it

Comments

  1. As Billy Joel said - You may be right - I may be crazy
    But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...