Skip to main content

Translating the translation

Tom Friedman does a grand job writing.  He is a NY Times columnist with many insightful books to his credit.  His recent work is called 'Thank you for being late'.  Below is my summation of the book.

I re-read it this weekend.  It is in his words a work of explanatory journalism.  He tries to distill complex ideas and concepts that occupy the world we live in and translates it to English.  From English.  He is right.  There is a vast ocean of data out there and not everyone has time nor energy to sift through it to get on close to even keel with what it all means.

Authors like Friedman or Neil deGrasse Tyson are amazing at making the arcane readable and understandable.

The Thank you book is the author's realization that we live in an ever accelerating world where we do not take a moment to pause.  Pausing allows people to start he quotes.  To start thinking, assimilating thoughts in their head perhaps even achieve wisdom.

We are all wound up to chase this and that and often our culture promotes the work hard and play harder lifestyles that in fact lead to many detrimental side effects.  But it need not be that way.

His book deals with three large themes prevalent today and affecting our very future - Globalization, Climate (change) and Technology.  He takes readers through amazing story telling on appreciating the big changes or as Malcolm Gladwell would call Tipping Points in civilization to present day and explains what it means to our future.

From Hadoop to the politics of climate and the general trends in migration and instant gratification there is many complex subjects handled with aplomb in a somewhat long treatise.  Nevertheless highly recommend it for a long plane ride.

My personal life philosophy matches this outlook where one needs to at least and perhaps first simply grasp the basic tenet of any new fad before becoming an unwilling victim to its popularity.  Pause. Think.  Decide.

Don't just click the Like button.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...