Skip to main content

No End in Sight

A book.  A film.  A story.  We humans are always looking for a beginning, a middle and a conclusion.  That is just how we are coded.  All neatly tied up in the 'end'.

Loose strings are not our thing.  Or is it?

I just 'finished' reading the latest installment by Dan Brown.  Book is called 'Origin'.  A thought provoking tale as always in the genre that he tends to work in - a thriller set amidst the debate between creation and evolution lobbies.  While to me the tale ended in a not so climactic manner but somewhat predictably is another matter but it did raise the desire to blog.

The question of all time for all mankind and the need to find an answer.  Where did it all begin and where will it all end?

To me the reality tends to be something akin to a mobius strip.  There is no starting point or end point on its zero Gaussian curvature.  The author tries to also highlight this by using the analogy of a infinite passageway in which the observer might see a bouncing ball coming from behind, approach the observer and continue on never to be seen again.

Our eventual demise as a species might well be not from famine or disease or any extraterrestrial event but from our very own creations in the form of intelligent machines that over take us by taking over the rudder.  And then it will continue until today's news is irrelevant.  But then again like the ant on the mobius we could come back to where we started.

The key here is the fact that the observer's ability to observe is a very small window of time within the vastness of geologic time.  The latter being simply a fabrication of the human mind which likes finality in all things whereas the reality could well be limitless and repeating.

So I ask - are you in the camp that believes in the beginning or the end?  Or?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...