Skip to main content

About Paul Erdos

The internet is a wonderful thing.  So is curiosity.  Put two and three together and sometimes you get more than six.

I stumbled upon a lot of interesting people and facts simply reading about a subject online.  Only to later discover that I could actually land a book about that subject at the local library.

So it was I discovered a Hungarian mathematician Paul Erdos (pronounced Air Dash).  Someone who learned about negative numbers at age three, did not ever cook in his lifetime or learn how to tie his shoes till age 11, he was an odd specimen that graced this earth.

I recently read a biography about Erdos titled, 'The man who loved only numbers' by Paul Hoffman.  Born to a set of Jewish math teachers, Paul lived the life of a monk in the pursuit of mathematical truth.

After reading the book I am still trying to decipher what I had just read and how this amazing mind was able to see what others could not see.  Similar mind bending ideas came to lot more people in the 20th century like the Indian mathematician, Srinivasa Ramanujan.  Based on Ramanujan's own admission he saw numbers through intuition and insights when god spoke to him.  Erdos on the other hand viewed god as a SF or supreme fascist.  Reading the book suggests Erdos as leaning toward atheism although commenting that he was not smart enough to know if God existed.
The book makes reference to the fact that Erdos acknowledged how Indian math had transformed western thinking including the work of Ramanujan.  He is said to have his speaking fees in India donated to Ramanujan's widow.

The back cover synopsis by British neurologist Oliver Sacks sums Erdos's life as that of an odd genius who had a sense of humor.

Some interesting quotes and a few limericks from the book that I want to capture (more for my own lookback than anything else)...


  • If anything is certain it is mathematics
  • If I am alive tomorrow we will solve this problem
  • A negative personality walks into a party and guests asked 'who left'?

There was a young man who said 'God 
it has always struck me as odd
that the sycamore tree
simply ceases to be
when there's no one about in the quad

'Dear Sir, Your astonishment's odd;
I am always about in the quad;
And that's why the tree
will continue to be,
Since observed by,
Yours faithfully, God'.


Every even number greater than 2 cab be expressed as a sum of two primes.
2 =  1+1
4 = 2 +2
6 = 3 + 3
8 = 3 + 5
and so on
100 = 11 + 89

A math major said it and I will say it again
there is always a prime between n and 2n


I remember taking a cog rail in the hills of Buda only to later discover that this math prodigy took hikes in the same woods half a century or more ago... chilling.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...