Skip to main content

Gender and Genetics

 WE live in a fractured world no doubt.

Progress of an organization or community or a country for that matter is measured not just in GDP and crime rates and carbon footprints and so on but performance indicators of KPI for social mobility.

While the concept is endearing the execution sucks.  It is the desire of the wise women and men that we humans, all of us, be treated equal.

By that it is an extrapolation of what the famous American President said in the late 1800s ..a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Again part romantic language and part interpretation the reality or the devil is in the details.  What exactly do we mean by that phrase?  What are the real world problems and more importantly solutions?

Ensuring each of us has equal rights to do the pursuing of life and liberty is a good catch phrase but no one wants to admit that a whole bunch of us are just born lazy.  We are dumbass couch surfers.

To that breed why would someone encourage a change of pace?  They are content in their dumbness.  And by that there are actually some who are genetically coded as dumb.  Not differently abled but cuckoo.  Pure and simple.

I say let them be.  Then there is the question of gender.  As in your biological makeup.  Pure chance. 50 50.  Much has been made about why the female portion of the gender pool has not had as much success and by that we mean visibility and representation in halls of power.

Well for starters for many years there was no concept of a hall of power.  This is a recent mumbo jumbo.  Fabrication laid on us by those that are good at marketing poop.

To say that being CEO of a Fortune 100 company is somehow more visible and noteworthy a role than a woman in Rajasthan carrying water on her head for 20 miles each day to nourish her brood of five is what the marketing machines have sold us.

That drives an unfortunate vicious cycle of women feeling deprived and wanting to get into matters that they would rather not.  I mean as long as reproduction remains a one sided thing what the heck are we arguing?  Not to sound misogynistic or anything but is it not the greatest achievement that only women folk can reproduce our next generations?  Think about it.  If not for them we would cease.  To exist.

So if they got that corner office 100% of the time what is the discrepancy?  It comes down to marketing.  We need more women advancing in all fields et al.  Well if they so want to they will stop reproducing and get on with it.  Let them decide.

Same goes for the massive BS that is pervasive in pop culture - equal rights for all races.  First of all the race is another marketing invention.  What the hell is a race?

Slippery slope is what it is.  Now we got black people who are queer or female being sought out for positions of power because of their physical characteristics with little to no attention being paid to their capability to do the job to which assigned.

I say this from personal observation where some glistening examples of doorknob equivalents were put in seriously visible and high paying positions in corporations because they had to meet their diversity quota.  Their skillset was their skin color and genital arrangement.  

I am wondering what the market for sex change and hyper tanning is going to look like in the near future.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...