Skip to main content

Call Me Maybe?

I have a thesis that I will propose about the state of college education in the United States. As I get to overhear many a student conversation on trains, social gatherings or from colleagues at work who have kids going to college I am stuck by the disconnect between fact and fiction. The kids that are in college (largely as in the middle of the statistical bell curve) are taking on loans that seem to average $30,000 by the time they get done with 3 to 4 years of college. That they are now looking to earn a wage to payback this loan becomes an immediate daunting task ahead of them when they need to be looking at the world through the opportunity lens without a hurdle just out the gate. American students have always in the past found gainful employment in a field of their choosing regardless of the field. That sure changed over the last 2 decades. Somehow though they have not connected with reality of today's education. They continue to do hourly jobs to fund part of their education which while a good thing also seems to set them in a mode of finding a blockbuster opportunity outside of the prescribed path of finishing a four year college program. They continue to choose education in fields with zero to meagre opportunity and not focus on the core sciences where Asian and European immigrants continue to meet the demand. Barely. While there is a gap between supply and demand in fields of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (oft refered to as STEM) the organic supply is seen to be dwindling. The success from the non high tech jobs is rare but that does not seem to connect with the brains of the millenials. Many of these young now look to make it on the music or movie stage and their acceptance of brand that their peers produce seems to fuel these Facebook crowds. I mean how else can someone explain the success of waitresses and no name kids tending bar to suddenly gain overnight stardom because they wrote a song called - Call Me Maybe?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...