Skip to main content

Drama of the Thai Boys



Hollywood is already salivating.  Could they rope in Tom Hanks to play some part perhaps.   Which studio gets the sole rights?  So on and on.  This after what the media has dubbed 'heroic rescue' by a team of international divers to save a dozen unknown Thai teenagers from a swampy cave in this SE Asian Buddhist country.

Why the fascination with someone who made poor decisions?  Of all places how come a story in remote Thailand garnered the attention of everyone from CNN to Elon Musk?  Ironically a large ferry carrying passengers in Thailand sank around the same time, not far from shore and killed dozens.  No one knows the name of a single dead.

I guess the answer came in the form of a coincidence.  I was recently e-reading.  Whoa.  Yes my readership knows that I am a paper version reader.  But now with laziness has come some change.  I discovered an e-book on Behavioral Economics at my local (online) library.  This one is written by professor Richard Thaler and titled - Misbehaving.

It highlights as its primary message that people are not economist but human and therefore susceptible more often than not to make irrational decisions.  As such it is littered with studies and references and an occasional joke and anecdote.

One of the references IMHO highlights the prominence of the Thai boys story.  Thaler cites an essay by another professor Schelling titled - The Life You Save May Be Your Own.  In that essay he gives an example of how people will donate their last cent to save a six year old Emily dying from cancer if the treatment prolongs her life by a month but not shed a tear and definitely not approach their checkbook if a county puts out an ad for expanding their local hospital.

He refers to this phenomenon as 'An Identified Life' vs. 'A Statistical Life'.  Abstract just does not work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...