Skip to main content

Curiosity and Imagination





Curiosity and Imagination.  Two invaluable gifts given to mankind that make us human.  Some of us have more of one or the other while some are gifted with both in abundance.   But regardless it is what separates us from the other species that inhabit this planet.   That and the idea to not decline money when offered to us.

Two separate events led me to pen this.  First was a movie I watched called 'The Magic of Belle Isle'.  The protagonist is a handicapped drunk played by Morgan Freeman.  One time award winning author turns to the bottle after his life is completely shattered by an accident.

He meets a young girl full of curiosity and chutzpah on a retreat by the lake.  While helping her understand the meaning of the word 'imagination' and write her own stories he turns a corner and finds new meaning to his life.

The other thought was really a combination of two books I read.  One was a while ago written by a Hollywood film producer called Brian Grazer and if I remember correct was titled 'Curiosity'.  The other is a newish title I picked up and am in the process of finishing, written by Mario Livio, an astrophysicist and author.  This book is titled 'Why'.

The author has spent a goodish bit of time researching the subject as a scientists is wont to do.  He describes that curiosity can be defined on two major axes - one that extends from perceptual to epistemic and the other that describes specific and diversive.

Epistemic is an insatiable kind of curiosity - the desire to know why things are the way they are.  Einstein was said to tell his biographer - "I have no special talents, just insatiable curiosity."

I do appreciate this type of 'But Why?' fact finding myself and spend endless hours reading the most arcane of subjects on occasion.  Simply because it feels good to have learned something.  Hard to quantify or explain to someone else perhaps.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...