Skip to main content

Does the world need governments?

I cannot help but notice how insane our world really is. The coming elections in America underscore the fact. Most of what the political parties actually campaign for is extermely irrelevant to the function of governing a nation. What exactly do you think governing a nation would or should include? To me there are only a few key things that you want to outsource to some organized entity so that you do not have to step up and do it yourself as you laze on that beach in Hawaii. 1. Make sure no one bombs the beach while you are napping. Ergo - need a military presence to keep bad guys out. Get the Government to manage this function. 2. Make sure that the road signs are consistent whether in Hawaii or New York city so my beer addled brain can process information about exit ramps quickly and without confusion. Ergo - need a standards body to make sure we know what we are buying, driving and selling. Get the Gov to manage this function. 3. Make sure there are trees on the beach to nap under. Ergo - make sure someone does not go at all the green on this planet so they can build more condos. Get the Gov. to protect some land with nature intact. 4. Make sure I can add and subtract the money at the beer store. Need decent education (also to decide whether to buy Japanese beer or Belgian) to process basic information. Get the Gov. to ensure that at least elementary education is made available to anyone that wants to get it. Rest is all humbug and the people should stop wasting time voting for someone who harps too much about these idiotic things. Ergo - no one left to vote for!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more