we would not have large Fortune companies that bottle this stuff -
from the likes of Coke to Pepsi to Praxair to Air Liquide..big bottles or small we need gas;
we would not (there beeno) have the likes of pharma companies producing gas buster pills;
we would not have all the large multinationals like Shell, Exxon, BP and then there would be no disasters that in turn keep other companies alive;
we would not have these large generals like motors or electric (where it seems they encourage imagination at work - @ home you can slouch) that rely on the gas that the shells produced;
speaking of which now there is a new shell in town called Shale (this a type of rock that needs gas and water to frack so we can get more gas out);
Its the gas that keeps our world employed. So next time you pooh pooh it as all gas think about all the hot air that the elected officials and corporates have to spew to keep us all afloat (on gas) so to speak..
how do you like all this vaporware?
Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
Comments
Post a Comment