Skip to main content

Here's a Thought - Praying on demand

Media BS comes in many forms.  The ones providing the BS to the media, or the media interpreting a situation and creating their own or someone wanting to take to the air and blow.  Some steam that is.


All can lead to an era of constant stench that only an intuitive mind can decipher.  One such is the incidence of the following statement that gets published when a personal or mass disaster strikes - Our thoughts and prayers are with "Insert Name Here" family and friends during this difficult time."


Now one question comes to my simple mind which is - when someone makes this statement about a bereaved family or person how long is their thoughts and prayers allocated to the said person or persons?  What is the statute of limitation on these?


Reason being  if another incident follows the one where the thoughts and prayers are allocated, can the thoughter send more thoughts to the thoughtee?  Where does he or she or they get such thoughts and prayers?  Do they have to buy them in advance?  Are they sold in bulk?   What is the high water mark for how many such thoughts and prayers one can send?  Can they ever get them back and recycle them?


Does time change flavor over time?  Does it go from being difficult to easy at which point the thoughts and prayers are returned to sender?  I am glad the USPS is not involved.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...