Skip to main content

Schrodinger's cat

If you believe your head is not screwed on right, this movie may be for you.   No it is not called  'Schrodinger's cat' but is based on the paradox of that name.   Schrodinger was an Austrian who formulated this idea to describe the multiple states in which something can exist.



The Austrian physicist posited that if a cat is enclosed in a box with a substance that might kill the cat then at any given time there are two (or more) states that simultaneously exist with respect to the cat.  It is both Dead and Alive at the same time and the actual outcome is confirmed by an observer who opens the box.


The movie that explores this idea is called 'Coherence'.



It is a sort of low budget, stage play set in a house (of the director) to handle a complex subject in this sci fi thriller.  Director portrays this concept, not unlike duality using a passing comet as the backdrop.  Movie has a cast of completely unfamiliar actors but the acting is very natural and engaging.


A group of friends gathered in a house over dinner find strange incidents happen to them during this passage of the comet.  All their mobile phone screens shatter for no reason.  Then there is a widespread blackout.  The lights go out in the house and one of the friend decides to go to the only house that has lights on the street to try and email his scientist brother about the unfolding events.


While he and a friend go out the rest of them wait it out for their return.  When the two do come back they are stunned and one of them describes watching the same set of friends minus the two (themselves) in a room sitting at a table in the other house but exactly like the one they left.  From there on events unfold that convey to the viewer that there are basically at least two sets of friends (the same friends) having a similar conversation and interaction which confounds logic.


They are all living in parallel universes and each stream continues to exist without collapsing into the other.


The movie ends with one of the guys talking to his female friend when his phone rings with the caller id of the same girl standing in front of him.


I suppose I now see the way things really are.  Or do I?







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more