Skip to main content

Interest in Taxes

Any country is able to control its economic destiny through a multitude of policy and regulation. Most of all if it has a productive workforce that is generally enlightened and happy this should not be a big deal.

However we live in an imperfect world. Thence there is never a 'Ram Rajya' (utopian existence) in practice. What every country ideally also strives to achieve is a balance between what it spends and what it earns in order to service its own debts, maintain public services and run the government.

Not as easy as it sounds. Partly a mystery that many an economist has put their minds to and proposed theses that sometimes echo in the halls of B schools - Adam Smith's Invisible Hand idea to Samuelson's Marcro Economic models et al. It should be noted that ironically Samuelson (a brilliant mind that had lasting impact on the science of Economics himself was born in Gary, Indiana which for many years ranked as the WORST place to live in the entire Unites 50 States. That he later graced Harvard and MIT to compile his works and educate us generations is a miracle.

Back on topic of my 'dis'Interest in how our government tends to run things and does more to TAX the brain than not.

Governments use two key tools to regulate the P&L statement for the country -

Monetary policy or Regulation of Interest Rates charged to lend monies to regional and private banks in the country; as well as

Fiscal Policy - regulation of Taxes applied to everybody else's earnings.

What we have now is a situation where the effective interest rate the FEDERAL RESERVE (debatable name) charges to lend money to other banks is ZERO. They are giving the DOLLARES away.

As it relates to TAXATION it is worse than a wild zoo with its occupants on pysechedelics. The Tax code actually encourages people to consult tax attorneys (who may or may not be equipped to provide any meaningful advice) to software companies that simplify the process to get people to part with their earnings.

What it also does is to allow individuals with the time or money to define ways to evade (legal) and in some cases avoid paying taxes owed to the government of the USA.

Instead what really should be happening is that the government which already has access to all my documented source of income should process the TAX due and send me the bill. They tend to deduct at source as well so the year end note should be more like a Christmas card - wishing us all well for the future with the taxes I paid YTD serving as my gift to SAM.

So much for the 50 page tax return exercise. It will be another nail in the mail service coffin who has to today ship all the junk papers I file with all its forms and schedules and sub schedules to some black hole in the IRS coffers where some nitwit then pores over it to confirm if it is correct. I mean this resembles the India of 60 years ago where people were building dams and roads with a broken shovel because we could not afford machines and had too many people.

A capitalist government should really focus on capitalizing and not socializing the ecosystem; through efficiency and not charity (in the form of meaningless jobs).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...