Skip to main content

Is Evolution all that it is cracked up to be?

I recently read a curious capitalist question the worth of social media - its technology, its economic and social implications. Anecdotally he observed that the jury is out on what benefit it brings to the larger society on the planet while making some in Silicon Valley very rich in quick order.

That led to a bigger question for me - is any and all human evolution from the moment Homo Erectus got erect and started walking to discovering fire to the wheel to Bill Ford's industrial revolution to the Jobs' iWorld gadgetry worth something?

Alternately are organisms lower on the evolution scale better off than Homo Sapiens Sapiens? Is it worth all the green house gas; the starvation and poverty; the trillion dollar wars; the tsunami devastations; and on and on. I do not intend to sound a pessimistic note but merely put the universe in (holistic) context. I benefit from all that our modern science has to offer every living day and am happy relative to my human counterparts in most of the world but I am certainly not sure if that in itself an achievement of any kind.

It was something I definitively strived for growing up since to be equipped with the luxury of time and money and health was a goal. Having reached that goal the next goal post on the road seems obscure. Looking back the question becomes - was this whole 40 year journey somehow worth it? Who is measuring it anyway? Me? My family? My neighbors? My colleagues?

Many people in the eyes of fellow humans have achieved far greater celebrity and material luxury along with time affluence and the ability to do what they want, when they want. Indian business magnate Anil Ambani built a billion dollar mansion for his family but has not moved in. Did he need a billion dollar abode to park his butt? Is his butt in the country to be parked? Was he foolish to do what he did?

It becomes more and more unclear what it is that we as a species are running to achieve. Longevity seems one of the self identified goals since life expectancy has gone up over time (at least with people with money) and allowing them to consume more resources for longer periods.

Beyond more consumption what is it that we plan for? Procreation and rearing our next generations seems another activity that all organisms seem prone to do as a matter of evolution. Here too the end game is not clear. The redundancy of the exercise is baffling. The self laudatory arrogance of the species is even more so.

Hence back to the animal life. Eat what you find, shit where and when you can, procreate if you are interested and then move on to graze and stare. Lot of time for self reflection? Did the Buddhist hit on it sooner?

Comments

  1. Very well said. I am convinced that we don't have a clear goal, and mask that in our longing for things which we may not really want-in the process creating wars, mayhem and other forms of greed. Feudalism of sorts is also there in some form in all countries, however much they deny it.

    The Buddhists seem close to the mark, if they all practice what they preach.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Could it all be a result of 'B' (grade) schools?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...