Skip to main content

Repetitive Futility

Reading 'The book of lists' by Umberto Eco triggered some thoughts on how humans have got themselves comfortable to living a fairly predictable and repetitive life. Think about it. We know our year has 365 or so 24 hour units broken in 52 weeks with the days numbered (pun intended).

That we also have variety of gadgets to track this elliptical passage of earth around its sun. Depending on what part of the rock we occupy tend to have rituals and customs to engage socially and do the same thing again and again at specific time of the year. Entire industries are built on these patterns. From back to school shopping to Christmas or Diwali lights to pulling out buried rodents to check on weather forecasts - what is the point of that? Or is it like the swinging pendulum with no point holding it up - nothing?

Is this orchestra playing for someone? Or is it merely an optical illusion? Are the characters on stage changing (although more are being added than removed every day) to come and do the same old routine over and over? Some traits are genetically inherited and some are acquired or learned over time. The outcome of all that learning still tends to drive us humans to not be phenomenally different than the generation prior.

Outside of the core activities of eating, shitting, procreating and resting the species has not yet done anything truly truly remarkable. They may have increased life expectancy by some measure but that merely prolongs the inevitable. We eat more than our ancestors and have issues with that approach. We do not sleep as much and are getting screwed because of it - the one thing we do seem to be not having trouble with is procreate. That too is lame since the most procreation is going on in areas of our world where people are uncertain of their offsprings' future and therefore are doing the lottery - the more you crank out the better the odds of having one carry the family name.

So back to zero?

Comments

  1. Even the family name idea to me sounds futile. How many Red Indian family names live on today, for instance?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...