To many an unaware individual of the readership the title might appear to be rather bizzare. It is. I for one had to do some quality research on the subject (the Langot) in this case.
See the whole effort stemmed from a news article in a reputable financial newspaper formerly owned by a dubious person of Australian origin (dubious applicable to the person's conduct and not so much his origins). Well so much for clues on what paper this was.
The (news) article in this case was about a brand called Lululemon suing another competitor in the retail clothing space for a patent on a Yoga Pant. The whole thing sounded so hilarious that I had to read it with much anticipation over tea.
The tea was good, the anticipation was about what exactly somebody called Lululemon could possibly sue for?
Turns out that this is about how a pant waist band should look and feel and fold and that it was patentable per the US PTO. Another competitor had the nerve or whatever it takes these days, to copy that and blatantly proceed to sell as their own.
Now for those not familiar with the brouhaha (this one requires a blog) over Yoga - India lost out big here - we could have patented the art of standing on one leg or upside down or many formats and made a killing - hindsight as they say is still to be invented.
Now we could have taken the Yoga Patent theory a bit further and applied to the undergarments the originators (Yogi or saints) wore, which happens to be a strip of cloth (Langot) aka loincloth made famous by the Mahatma, worn over the loins. I will let the uneducated masses research what constitutes the loins. Not to be confused with lions. Spell checkers can go crazy.
Thence if India had indeed patented the langot we would be suing the entire planet that even dreamt of the Yogic pleasures since a lot of yoga affects the dreams you dream.
Dream on!
Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
Dreamy stuff indeed. Which brings me to an idea. The bikini, I propose (at least the lower half) was stolen from the langot idea. Therefor, we the inventors should sue the so-called inventor of the lower half of the bikini. Maybe the two halves were invented by the same guy. Or maybe the censors added one half.
ReplyDeleteas expounded earlier multiple flavors could be marketed on the peninsula viz - the Mandakini, the Nandakini, or a custom fit branded with your own name in front of the kini..
ReplyDeleteto build kinship in a manner of speaking