Skip to main content

New product idea(s)

I was curious to see how in the marketing driven world I could improve on how much stuff is sold.  After all we are called consumers.  So how do I make sure we continue to add to the gross mass available for consumption.  One way is to have more of everything per capita.  More cars, shirts, computers, phones, ketchup bottles, kale salad, yoga pants etc.

Another is to grow the size of the pie.  Marketers love this sort of BS.  Pie in this case refers to the available size of public willing to consume.  So I got to researching what exactly that looks like.  According to some yoda that crunch numbers for a living the earth produces approximately 19 new faces for every 1,000 of us each year.  During same time some of us farts disappear.  At the approx gross rate of 8 per 1,000.

So net about 11 new dudes or dudettes or transitory entities show up for every 1,000 which equates to about 75M naya mukhdas.  Many many selfie takers, bookers and tweeters.  Ergo more phones.

Hello!

Now what if we were to work on bringing back the dead?  Not literally but somehow convince the living that the dead wanna continue to send their thoughts from another world.  It is such an ingrained habit they couldn't give it up even if they were DEAD!

Deadly Idea no?

If at first we are able to capture half the market for dead dudes it will boost the economy by 50% that is 30 odd Million more phones.  Of course we have to make sure the phones are special.  Example they come with - you guessed it - a Dead Battery.  After all it makes perfect sense.  Then we have the question of what apps you want on it.  Who will upgrade them?  What domain do you register these deadbeats?

I think we need to find a Dead Shahana to answer these vital questions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...