Its interesting to see how riding the coattails has taken on a life of its own in the current vernacular in Silicon Valley. Prominent brands that develop hardware or software often show case their wares by hosting large parties called Developer Conferences or Media Events or some such. Hey if you have dollars to spend on marketing why not? The trickle effect of this effort though is clearly defined by how popular the commodity already is in the market.
Take a very popular communication device that markets its latest incarnation or redesign at a press conference and the hoopla surrounding it starts days or months before the event and concludes much after. So what the brand gets its incidental exposure at no additional cost. Media giants in turn benefit from this sometimes GDP altering event and also boost their own ratings and revenues riding the proverbial coattails (I am still looking for someone who actually has said garment extension).
Such devotion is not seen for example when a lesser known brand does a coming out party for their redesigned wares. They might see some conversation in the 24 hours following their event but the buzz dies out like a semi flat can of soda.
So it stands to reason that the multiplier effect for promoting an already popular product or service is huge with the lesser known under dogs have a hard climb out.
Ultimately the true worth is in the eye of the beholder and there is significant evidence (from the author's vantage) that the beholdees are shutting their eyes to evaluate the product and judge its value and relaying on their neighbor to determine their next purchase. The latter is commonly defined as the herd mentality. This can have the intrinsic effect of dumbing the brain and today's marketing takes full advantage of this vulnerability.
Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
keeping up with the Joneses is still the most powerful buying motive, else we could probably do with a lot less- branded or otherwise.
ReplyDelete