Skip to main content

Permission to enter (in 39 steps)

This is not a corny thriller title to compete with 50 shades - far from it. It is about the idea of controlling entry into a country. I can see how the rich and powerful countries would want to limit access to their territorial boundaries and the terra within through policy designed to deter unwarranted applicants. But for a country like India to have a policy that restricts entry based on the nationality of the visitor seems farcical. To add to that the process designed to obtain the permission, the VISA application process is a first level deterrent. Now if I was the minister of tourism or an equivalent titled bureaucrat, my objective would be to encourage more applicants rather than deter. Au Contraire. They have erected a barrier that very likely results in the average American farmer (assuming someone from Iowa actually gets it into his head to go see the TAJ) to take a weekend to merely understand the 39 step process of what exactly is going to be involved to get that VISA. This might actually be easier for the American farmer with no previous notion of what 'an India' is. For an ex-pat who is now naturalized in the US to obtain entry for his or her own offspring is the tedium - I speak from experience. So step 1 - understand the 18 page manual of what is needed to obtain the said entry permit step 2 - remember to follow the 39 steps in the 18 pages exactly with the added thrill of having a form that is now somewhat different than what the FAQ or pseudo help (less) youtube shows step 3 - go kill a few trees to print the tomes needed to validate that you indeed are who you say you are and that you confirm five ways that you have a child who you claim is your offspring that for some bizzare reason you want to cart to India step 4 - if you have proven that you are demented by following the steps above then proceed to book an appointment with a third party that runs its operation from a seedy neighborhood (hey rents are cheap) where you risk losing your wallet and your life (in that order or not) and enter to present said documents along with lots of money from your wallet that you managed to hold on to step 5 - this is where it jumps to a tech wonderland - the whole tracking is online with detail steps showing what is going on with that passport of yours and then step 6 - await the text message that says your VISA is ready then step 7 - step into the same office in the skethcy neighborhood (if you lived once you will live again) and grab that book before they decide to close shop and move Voila - you have now been given permission to enter INDIA.. Incredible (I mean Incredible India!)
Labels:

Comments

  1. RajendraAugust 24, 2012 at 4:10 AM

    Maybe Mastercard should enter the world of visa-giving!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Diamond HeadAugust 24, 2012 at 7:03 AM

    Haa..given Pay-Pal Discovered a new friend this idea is actually Gold

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...
2 comments
Read more

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more