Skip to main content

California Refund Value Scam

CRV as labeled on recyclable containers sold in the state of California. By law (I presume) it is an IOU, to refund a deposit taken.   Explicitly stated a promise to the consumer that a container deposit will be taken upfront on their purchase of said container, which will then be returned on recycling of empties.

Latter is where the scam begins.  Returns.  In order to return said container one must have a facility that processes incoming empties.  In a state with 40+ million people largely scattered across five or so major metro areas millions of empties are generated on a daily basis.  Water, soda, and many other versions of gaseous or non gaseous, alcoholic or non type beverage containers make the majority.

Sometimes the cost of the containers is as high as 40% of the product's sale price that a consumer pays at checkout.  Yet to reclaim that back is a process as arduous as perhaps making the container themselves.

  • First job to find a location that accepts and refunds.  Well nigh impossible considering that was a duopoly between two private enterprises who likely had a contract with the state to do this.  For the large population footprint they had approximate coverage (by my estimate) of one location for every 30,000 people.  Average drive time (not including cost of fuel) to do the drop around 15 minutes.
  • Wait time at location. Consider the above and imagine at least 45 minutes to complete your transaction.  Based on the size of your home you also likely did not carry a Hummer full of bottles to return but a small volume at a time.  Exception to that are panhandlers and trash trawlers who scavenge empties from garbage and public facilities for a honest payout.  Bums have one avenue to fund their chill.
  • Mood of the operator.  The job of handling what sometimes is almost garbage is no picnic.  Consider standing in a metal shipping container (that can reach over 100 degrees on a summer afternoon) next to a high decibel machine that compacts bottles all day long.  Not to mention the stink of the place.  Also consider that half the customers showing up to return in the above mentioned (hoity) locales tends to be nut jobs too.  The presumably rich are too rich to do all this dirty work.  Hence the operator job is likely taken by a person with some issues of their own.  No one wants that job.  In my interviews of the operators some were ex-con in rehab, some were battling health issues, some appeared to be lost and sultry.
Latest breaking news - one of the largest recycler enterprise shuttered its doors - literally.

Guess what?  Piles of empties sitting in store parking lots where these operations were housed in portable containers (no pun).  Now you have 1 location (a monopoly) for 60,000 people.  Not at all viable for someone with a family to attend to.

Ergo your deposit (which almost was) is now a mandatory tax.  As high as 40% per container sold.  Way to go California.  Let us invest it in another billion dollar project that cracks in less than  a year.

For all its showmanship on being environmentally conscious et al it is essentially an ill thought at best and robbery in its worst case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...