Would the opposite be unpuzzled? Here is what puzzles me - I have an issue with complete being the opposite of incomplete. When achievers can look forward to be over or under why is there no such thing as overcomplete? After all you can certainly overdo something? Yet there is no sign of underdoing anything? Beginning to understand where I am going? Don't look there is no overstand either. There is an understudy I understand. More study (not overstudy) is required to get onboard this art of estimating whether there is an over or under. Simply can't get over it is an understatement. In some context over is complete or vice versa. So let me go complete this again. Some folk might after all state - I am completely over him.
Among human crayons I am Brown. Also, my thoughts bounce around and resemble the idea of Brownian motion. This blog is an interface for the reader into this unique jello I call my mind. A mind so fertile anything grows. An agnostic yet curious mind. A mind attempting the Horatian or Kabirism maxim of Carpe Diem or Aaj kareso aab. Rated W I L D for wilfully irritating to large demographic is sometimes the latter - graphic in its descriptions. Caveat Lector!