Would the opposite be unpuzzled? Here is what puzzles me -
I have an issue with complete being the opposite of incomplete. When achievers can look forward to be over or under why is there no such thing as overcomplete?
After all you can certainly overdo something? Yet there is no sign of underdoing anything? Beginning to understand where I am going? Don't look there is no overstand either.
There is an understudy I understand. More study (not overstudy) is required to get onboard this art of estimating whether there is an over or under. Simply can't get over it is an understatement.
In some context over is complete or vice versa. So let me go complete this again. Some folk might after all state - I am completely over him.
I have an issue with complete being the opposite of incomplete. When achievers can look forward to be over or under why is there no such thing as overcomplete?
After all you can certainly overdo something? Yet there is no sign of underdoing anything? Beginning to understand where I am going? Don't look there is no overstand either.
There is an understudy I understand. More study (not overstudy) is required to get onboard this art of estimating whether there is an over or under. Simply can't get over it is an understatement.
In some context over is complete or vice versa. So let me go complete this again. Some folk might after all state - I am completely over him.
Reminds me of an old college joke where a prof asked a student who was taking shelter under a tree- Why are you understanding the tree?
ReplyDeleteclearly he was not a Buddha else he would be sitting or is it reclining?
ReplyDelete