So to keep it so - flowing - that is - there has to be more on the earn side of the equation and less on the spend side. Else it would be negative you see?
That is when you would go bankrupt etc. It is assumed that a good sense for cash flow implies ability to stay liquid - financially that is.
Many get caught in the trap of being stressed since they seem to not pay much attention to the spend side of the equation while coming with innovative ways to improve their earn methods. This can be said to happen at the individual level to small corporations to large Fortune companies to the largest governments on this planet.
What I am still trying to figure out in light of the financial chaos is who is truly holding the bag? All the wise men that came up with the convoluted math to make the spin clearly forgot Heisenberg's uncertaintly principle - you cannot predict two things at once with certainty. We know there are collossal losses but we do not know who is on the losing end.
'Leverage' has mechanical limits after all.
That is when you would go bankrupt etc. It is assumed that a good sense for cash flow implies ability to stay liquid - financially that is.
Many get caught in the trap of being stressed since they seem to not pay much attention to the spend side of the equation while coming with innovative ways to improve their earn methods. This can be said to happen at the individual level to small corporations to large Fortune companies to the largest governments on this planet.
What I am still trying to figure out in light of the financial chaos is who is truly holding the bag? All the wise men that came up with the convoluted math to make the spin clearly forgot Heisenberg's uncertaintly principle - you cannot predict two things at once with certainty. We know there are collossal losses but we do not know who is on the losing end.
'Leverage' has mechanical limits after all.
Comments
Post a Comment