Skip to main content

2 minute noodle to 2 year saga

Maggi.  A household brand in India all across the sub-continent.  For decades.  Nestle, the parent company that owns the brand it bought from Mr. Maggi of Switzerland years ago could not be prouder and richer for it.

But back in the summer of 2014 something happened that today has become a case study for B-schools.  On how to or not to handle a public relations nightmare.

Some government servant tasked with testing packaged goods in Delhi picked up a few samples from a store and sent them for testing at a government lab that may or may not have the cleanest and up to date test equipment.  The test came back showing higher than prescribed level of MSG and lead.

It led to a back and forth between the righteous Swiss claiming superior process and technology that vouched for its product quality and the Indian babu bureaucracy with a hitherto unknown motive to lambast the gora gang of selling sub-standard food products to a third world nation.

This argument took on many hues not found in a packet of masala, with both sides bringing big guns to bear.  The government's top cop for food safety vs. Big B himself endorsing the food was safe.  Social media lit up opining everything from 'hoard all you can before they are gone' to 'down with Nestle' bhashan baji.

Finally Nestle ended up recalling the product from all shelves - whatever that meant in a non auditable supply chain - taking a hit to their profits north of $100M and finally using a Narayanan (part of Nestle's bureaucracy) to go appease to the local police.

Nestle apparently celebrated their victory when product went back on the shelves by having a second course of 2 minute noodles during a formal lunch in Vevey, Switzerland.  But not before Baba Ramdev snuck in with his Patanjali.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...