Skip to main content

Idiomatic and Euphoric

I got to thinking of all the ways American English has evolved.  Current use depending on the user provides ample anecdotal evidence of cliches and verbiage being used with no thought given to said cliche's origins or propriety or relevance to time.  It is a hoot.

A recent planned power outage hilarity that ensued in Northern California (more on the topic itself in another blog) led to multiple communication experts chiming in with the play by play.

Here we go with the idiom(t)s including yours truly. 'Play by play' is clearly a sport term from the days when people listened to an antiquated device called a Radio.

It is aimed at providing the listener a perspective that they would miss not being at the scene of the play.  Local and even international TV channels, Radio (that works when American's drive in their car), Social Media apps (when Americans look at their cell phone when driving their car) and other broadcasts flooded the market.

For the people at home the funniest event was when the TV anchors kept blabbing about their variety of teams out in the dark (literally and figuratively) trying to shed light.  Most of the folks they were trying to engage were - did you guess - in the dark.  Ergo they could not tune into the TV. 

Idioms that got most hits - everyone was scrambling to keep an 'Eye on Things'.  Some tried to have their 'Eye on the Situation'.  Others had their 'eye out'.  And then what?   I must say that things and situations must not have had so many eyes weighing them down or rolling on them at any given time.  Are you rolling yours now?

With these eyes of the reporters' sockets I wonder how they were wandering around in the dark?  Most importantly how did they find them back?  After they decided to not keep the eye where they left them.  Another favorite is 'needle in a haystack'.  What needle?  Unless you are a druggie who is so high that they literally cannot distinguish the city sidewalk and a haystack this idiom has no relevance today.  Nobody has any haystacks.

Nextdoor is another entertaining site where for zero cost you can watch neighbors post some really amusing comments -

Other than neighbors also keeping their eyes out and other junk that they cannot fit in their household -

  • Looking for a electrician - I commented - I saw one
  • Looking for a handyman to put some decorative lights - I commented - You can see them in Home Depot
  • Need newborn photographer - My comment - they usually have no experience
  • Keeping my eye on the back - I commented- it is dangerous to rely on one eye when driving
  • Need standby generator - oxymoron?
And while we are on (of off) the topic what is it with these sport analogies?  Touch base.  Let us play defence.  He is out in left field.  Etcetera.

First - touching anyone these days is a federal offense and get you locked up (out in the pasture).
Second - playing with words like defence can get you locked up.
Third  - Why not leave him in the field (or pasture) as it were?  Why debate left and right?  Maybe he was touching someone or playing with the wrong words?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...