Skip to main content

I P O

Initial Public Offering.  A way for new businesses to raise capital.  Legit by all the laws of the land.  Done to death.

Yet we get a bunch of surprises each year when these so called entrepreneurs attempt to convince the public to invest in their dreams.

Recent history would suggest the irony and the bizarre nature of how the broader market evaluates the worth of any business.


  • WeWork - a business founded on the idea of leasing or buying large square footage in busy metros and then renting it out for hefty premiums to other businesses with 'just in time' or 'temporary work space' needs.   This concept garnered ridiculous amount of excitement from the bankers who touted it as yet another unicorn (more on this later).  Turns out the idea of WeWork being workable was flawed.  At least in terms of its valuation.  Revenue models were broken, but marketed as gravy by Ivy league types working for large brands on wall street.  Someone figured out that the emperor had no clothes.
  • Peloton - the static bicycle company.  Sold with a lot of hoo ha dynamism by charismatic faces of the CEO and CMO. Cult like following with word of mouth publicity.  Does not translate into a valuation of an established car company.  But the market kept pitching the idea to unsuspecting investors.  Who bought and failed.  The flub factor is high for all these businesses who seemed to create magic out of thin air and sell something intangible and experiential.  The latter is all the buzz among the millenial and younger crowd who does not want to do the math.  Experiences are fine but don't be arrogant and sell happiness.  That is what Peloton was promising.  Really?  Buddha 2.0?  Even the Gautama failed to find it and he had to check out and go in the woods for a decade.  Oh the humanity.
  • Ride sharing - Another brilliant idea in concept.  And practice. Frictionless cab service.  But not worth $75 billion.  That is what Uber was originally priced by wall street and then the smoke and mirrors became only smoke.  Choking kind. With no cars (on its books) but valued same as Ford Motor.  Finally priced at much less when they went public, the stock dropped like a rock in the year that followed.  Its rival did not fare better.  'Lyft' seemed like a one word oxymoron.
All start-ups that attain sky high value topping a billion before anyone has seen a single share of it are termed unicorns.  Another corny term coined by the cult of Silicon Valley in its echo chamber, many of these examples show that the start up start looking more like a fall down.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...
2 comments
Read more