Skip to main content

Auto-no-me?

Autonomous or self driving vehicles are buzzing in the news in Silicon Valley.  As in they are yet not buzzing on the roads of the valley or any other meadow or hill.  Yet.  The pundits are out in force and fantasizing about what the future might hold.

One of the things on their pundit scale likely to hit the road soon is an automobile that requires no driver.  No intervention during the course of transportation, whatsoever.  No accidents, no lawsuits, no hospital trips and no policing?  Tap, tap and go.  Snooze, make out, watch a movie and arrive.

Now there are a lot of questions surrounding this idea least of them having to do with the actual technology to pull it off but with the regulatory framework the government would need to put in place to allow said form of mobility.

The idea is that with more sensors per vehicle than popcorn in a bag the average person is going to be ensconced in a computer on wheels that will never make a mistake and deliver the occupant to their intended destination.  Literally robot meet taxi.

Do no evil - the so called Google philosophy is also the company that is the leader and pioneer in the business of engineering this so called auto-matic-mobile and has been testing prototypes for a million driven miles.  Variety of standard vehicles were converted to be computers with sensors and road tested under varying circumstances to learn and become smarter about decision making.

The idea has definite merit but I am struck by the irony of it all.  Here I was leaving India decades ago, an uber crowded place where one could never enjoy the experience of driving anything, anywhere and now America with more per capita road real estate to ply their vehicles has become clogged.  It is not fun to drive anymore.  At least to go to work.  May be its the work and not the driving.

I don't know but I do know that older people needing to visit their doctor and with impaired vision now could rely on their autonomous Jeeves on wheels to do the needful.  But then again with the Internet of Things happening in tandem the pundits claim the patient would not even leave their home in the first place.  The doctor will have received their vitals before their patient even woke up and tweaked their prescription from Bangalore or Bangor so the Amazon Drone would drop it on their doorstep before they had even read the morning news.

Could the headline say - There are No News!  Now what is the fun in that?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...