Skip to main content

Auto-no-me?

Autonomous or self driving vehicles are buzzing in the news in Silicon Valley.  As in they are yet not buzzing on the roads of the valley or any other meadow or hill.  Yet.  The pundits are out in force and fantasizing about what the future might hold.

One of the things on their pundit scale likely to hit the road soon is an automobile that requires no driver.  No intervention during the course of transportation, whatsoever.  No accidents, no lawsuits, no hospital trips and no policing?  Tap, tap and go.  Snooze, make out, watch a movie and arrive.

Now there are a lot of questions surrounding this idea least of them having to do with the actual technology to pull it off but with the regulatory framework the government would need to put in place to allow said form of mobility.

The idea is that with more sensors per vehicle than popcorn in a bag the average person is going to be ensconced in a computer on wheels that will never make a mistake and deliver the occupant to their intended destination.  Literally robot meet taxi.

Do no evil - the so called Google philosophy is also the company that is the leader and pioneer in the business of engineering this so called auto-matic-mobile and has been testing prototypes for a million driven miles.  Variety of standard vehicles were converted to be computers with sensors and road tested under varying circumstances to learn and become smarter about decision making.

The idea has definite merit but I am struck by the irony of it all.  Here I was leaving India decades ago, an uber crowded place where one could never enjoy the experience of driving anything, anywhere and now America with more per capita road real estate to ply their vehicles has become clogged.  It is not fun to drive anymore.  At least to go to work.  May be its the work and not the driving.

I don't know but I do know that older people needing to visit their doctor and with impaired vision now could rely on their autonomous Jeeves on wheels to do the needful.  But then again with the Internet of Things happening in tandem the pundits claim the patient would not even leave their home in the first place.  The doctor will have received their vitals before their patient even woke up and tweaked their prescription from Bangalore or Bangor so the Amazon Drone would drop it on their doorstep before they had even read the morning news.

Could the headline say - There are No News!  Now what is the fun in that?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...