Skip to main content

Jurasick world - movie

No it is not a spelling mistake.  I really felt sick after watching the latest installment of Hollywood's amalgam of our reptilian ancestors with modern humans.

I am not sure what made this movie popular since nothing that was compiled in this production made any sense other than several instances of showcasing human idiocy that would highlight our place in the pecking order below the reptilian.

It starts with some mindless interaction between members of what constitutes a modern American white family where the parents unload their two kids, older one of which is a loser who owns a headset and maintains a cheesy girl crush, on a vacuous sister that has no clue that her nephews even exist.

Why she signs up to host these two remains a mystery that never unravels.  That she has them brought to a one of a kind theme park containing live dinosaurs that she has operational control of and no time to engage in any other activity other than run this giant park is weird.  Character is played by Bryce Howard who is the daughter of a smart man called Ron Howard.

Then there is an idealistic Navy seal that's found employment at a theme park run by a whacko immigrant of unknown origin played by Irrfan Khan.  The seal's motivation to be at this Dino compound is another mystery that has the audience likely confused until they discover that he has always been wanting to point a gun at a massive creature while ogling at a semi naked woman.  He gets his chance several times during some moronic chase sequences through Hawaii's pastures where some location shoot was done passing of for Costa Rica - again without any logic.

Spielberg has co-funded the project and in terms of return on investment has certainly hit a home run as the film grossed ridiculous amount of money.  I saw it for free with a loaner DVD from our county library.

But with some big names in production and directing behind it I am very confused as to the point of this exercise.   

Comments

  1. RajendraMarch 13, 2016 at 10:13 PM

    I never understood what this reptile -or any other-has that is so fascinating to humans. The fact that people pay to watch such antics speaks volumes of the low (intellect)-life inhabiting the earth..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more