Skip to main content

Geography of Genius - book review

A former NPR correspondent and now author, Eric Weiner a resident of Washington DC, has written this witty but sort of non conclusive body of work around what makes genius grow in certain parts of the world vs. another.  That is if you buy into the notion that genius indeed is geographically concentrated in certain lat long vs. another.

His travels take him from Silicon Valley, the mother-ship of all innovation these days, to former great cities that produced masters in art, philosophy, science etc.  From Athens, Greece to Calcutta, India he travels to seek out what genius really was and is.  From some experiments done by an English fella called Galton, he starts his narrative about the Galton Box.  This dude decides to measure everything that can be statistically analyzed, including figuring out which part of England had the most comely of women.

He used felt pad and pins to do this activity and came up with a map showing the Londonites were prettiest and Scottish lassies were ugly.  From this the conclusion drawn is that even the most blase concepts can be measured and if done right can shed light on complex ideas.

Genius he concludes is not a genetic phenomenon or something that happens in a lab, it is the recognition of a trait as determined by the public that benefits from said attribute.  Many times genius is recognized posthumously while the artist or scientist may be considered a nut when creating or rendering his genius when alive.  Such is the irony of genius.  From Tesla to Monet there are examples of how an amazing life was mistreated by fellow man but later discovered to be a genius.

Also there are a host of mitigating factors that ensure the creation of genius in one part of the world vs. another and not as he shows through forced manual intervention like hiring a bunch of Russian engineers and making them live in close proximity for a period of time.  Politics, culture, circumstance and even adversity at times has fueled imagination and creative thinking to lead to a breakthrough which is now recognized as genius.

Rabindranath Tagore and Amar Bose are from that part of the world where today you would be hard pressed to find room to breathe yet during a different period and circumstance something motivated these two individuals with modest backgrounds to do work recognized in art and science to this day.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
2 comments
Read more

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...
2 comments
Read more

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...
2 comments
Read more