Skip to main content

Getting attributed

I sat through 2 days of lectures on Attribution and Marketing.  Attribution is the action of regarding a quality or feature as characteristic of or possessed by a person or thing.

Well so that is the text book definition and it is essentially what I was there to learn about. In the context of identifying audiences to whom I might target an offer to.  An offer to spend at a restaurant or buy another shirt they do not need or something to essentially keep the conspicuous consumption theme alive.

The gentleman lecturer was a veteran of having sold many a thing in his life - mostly media - which in today's lingo is anything that constitutes a message that reaches a variety of consumers.  His background as a salesman sort made him the father figure to preach the gathered flock (we were all employees of the same organization who signed up for this) about the nuances of what makes for good marketing and what was cutting edge today.

Frankly a lot of the tried stories or use cases as they like to call them appear tired.  Most large brick and mortar businesses (not selling said brick and mortar but built from - as in physical stores occupying vast acreages) are folding under the dual onslaught of online commerce and also because there is just too much damn brick being used to build too many stores to sell shirt and underwear no matter how many 20% off coupons they drop from airplanes.

What struck me as particularly entertaining is how the man on the soap box kept using brand names like McKinsey and other identifiable marketer names to attribute key metrics and research findings to.  When in fact a lot of what I learned of the American commerce landscape and its marketing genius came from watching the TV sitcom called 'Seinfeld'.

I mean George (quintessential neurotic character from the show) goes out to buy a car convinced that Consumer Reports said Volvo is the car but instead flips to get a Chrysler LeBaron because the polyester suit sales guy convinces him that it formerly belonged to a John Voight (as you can see not the actor but a guy that spelled his name with an H).

Also the store tactics to sell you more than you need whether its a lube job for a car or a suit with ivory buttons was hilariously caricatured in various episodes in the Show About Nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...