Skip to main content

The Gene - a book review

 Written by  Siddhartha Mukherjee.  A very learned man.  Winner of the Pulitzer and so on.  This book is a tome and I could only finish reading it in a matter of days because I have nothing better to do.  I  had previously read another book he wrote about cancer.  That was intense.

'The Gene' is also characteristically profound.  It spans a period of 1,000 years in history and focuses on the one common denominator of all that is alive - the gene.  The manual for living creatures.

The book specifically steers its focus toward discussing the human genome (the collection of all the code needed to make us human) and what it means in the arc of time from the past to the present condition and to what the future may hold.

The book is phenomenal not because of being well researched and thought provoking but because it connects the dots with so many other fields in sciences and humanities.  It shows the reader that all disciplines and study that mankind has performed or does are inextricably linked.  It is consistent with the idea that we are one species with multiple ways of presenting our intellect and shaping the direction of the future.

The complete title of the book is - The Gene: An Intimate History.  It is intimate because the author tells it from a personal standpoint where members of his extended paternal family have been afflicted with mental illness and he pondered if that would affect him or his children.

History, specifically science of the gene the books tells us was shaped not merely by biologists or medical professionals but by mathematicians and also economists in their own ways.  Pythagoras had proposed the concept of a child as a parallel to the famous theorem we know him for.  Hypotenuse of a triangle is a mathematical derivative of the other two sides of the right angle triangle.  Similarly a child is a derivative of its two parents.  Plato then Aristotle further shaped this thinking and the latter proposed that we are created by instructions that are coded into us from both our biological creators.

The book describes Darwin's famous voyage across the Atlantic Ocean finally coming to live in the Galapagos islands and his habit of noting observed fact into his notebooks.  Obviously as he draws out his thinking on paper without a central God as creator, much different than Divine Interventionist would like to propose he was also trying to understand why one species disappeared and another took root.  Enter Malthus the economist with his theory of competition for resources.  That led to the survival of the fittest paradigm. 

All these stories weave to present day and present some chilling questions for the reader about the responsibility and burden of scientific discovery.  What happens as we contemplate gene mapping and gene control and genetic design?  Are we playing god? Ironic.

I have been fortunate to be able to do what I enjoy doing - read voraciously like a caterpillar feeding on mulberry leaves.  Being jobless has its perks.  And to boot in a nod to my own genetic code where my optical lens is starting to show its wear, I have gone progressive.  As in the type of lens fitting my optometrist suggested I use.  That said large print versions are my best friend these days and so is the public library.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...