Ambani gets a salary cut
India puts up a population counter (like the US has a debt counter)
Marissa Mayer becomes CEO of Yahoo
Dog saved from drain
Kim Kardashian poses in a tinier bikini
Euro Zone ministers meet - again
US got more golds than any other country in the world at the Olympics
Facebook stock is now half off
Ergo -
I turned off my subscriptions to all forms of paid spam on all channels - digital, TV, paper et al - that should be newsworthy
Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
I have an all-important question.. who exactly is Kim Kardashian? Might have missed on something monumental by not keeping myself abreast of newsworthy females at the other end of the planet.
ReplyDeleteKim Kardashian controls half of all gossip channels and print magazine output. The other half is taken by an entity called Lindsay Lohan. Not sure if either are their real names but the American public has an insatiable appetite for their doings and in so doing have set them on a pedestal.
ReplyDelete