Skip to main content

Is anything real?

Every so often there are news articles on research being conducted here and there about who we are and what is the meaning of it all.

A recent study in the UK asked the same question and posited a response indicating that everything we think is real is in fact a hallucination.  Some dictionaries describe the verb 'hallucinate' as -experience a seemingly real perception of something not actually present, typically as a result of a mental disorder or of taking drugs.


I find that description fascinating.  There are a lot of assumptions in the description.  First is Experience.  Second the use of word Real.  Third the word Perception and then Present.  People that study this stuff would have a field day with it.  Everything is a matter of perception at the end of the day.  Whoa!

I just tried to present another weird cliche.  End of the day?  Which implies there is a certain beginning and end?  How arrogant.  Perception too is a matter of consensus.  What a majority thinks 'is' is becomes the societal standard.  Of course the counter argument is that - we empirically measured it and therefore it is not fantasy but scientific fact, thusly not un-real.

Well.  Your measurement was also based on tools and objects in the observed universe and agreed to in consensus.  But if we are all mind over matter assuming there is a mind, mind you then we are left to ask if there is a there there (as someone once asked).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...