Skip to main content

Nilgiri Rail

It was in the 1980s that I as a teenager visited the hills of Ooty or Ootacamund in the Northwest corner of the state of Tamilnadu, with my parents.  The train station was and is called Udagamandalam.  So you guessed it -there is a railroad that one can take to get to the summit at just over 2,400 feet above sea level.

The train and the railway now are part of a UNESCO World Heritage site designation which ensures a lot of visitors and therefore revenue to contribute to the otherwise bankrupt rail system owned and operated by Indian Rail.  Technically it is labeled the Nilgiri Mountain Railway and operates in a jurisdiction called Southern Rail.

It is the only rack rail in India and last night I stumbled on a British documentary about the origins and ongoing operations of this magnificent journey in time.  The rack is essentially a flat gear that engages with a cog in the locomotive as it climbs up and slides downhill allowing extra traction on a steep grade.

With a total length of just over 50 km it takes a few hours to get from the sweltering plains below in Mettupalayam to the cooler air of the Nilgiri Mountains.  The memories are of a fog filled morning and waking and walking along the rail tracks breathing in crisp mountain air.

I do not know to what extent this is possible today but it appears the railway is very much operational.  Imagined and built by the British Raj at the time over a 100 years ago this was a getaway destination then and likely still is.

The hills provide a suitable climate for tea growing and Nilgiri tea (which I remember fondly) has a taste all its own - like the other hill region known for its brew - Darjeeling in North India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...