Skip to main content

Downsizing - film review

A two hour soporific production which is a cross between Gulliver's travels and Armageddon that tends to drift aimlessly with the help of star power.

Using Matt Damon as the poster boy literally is now getting old.  Hollywood realizing the material is sketchy at best uses a once popular face to peddle half witted and crazy movies to the unsuspecting audience.

Watching them as cheaply as possible as a good alternative.  So I rented this DVD last night and found that the tale was indeed mildly intriguing with some light moments but otherwise a drag with holes bigger than those in the ozone layer.  By the way the movie premise was about the latter as in the greenhouse gases emitted by us humans getting us closer to the day when gases escaping from the ice will melt Antarctica and lead to catastrophic floods.

Using some real data like Norway's food bunker where unique grain and sperm varieties are stored underground for a real life apocalypse the movie wanders for an entire two hours with no purpose.  The entire story board is about people opting to voluntarily shrink to less than 99% of their body mass and volume to then live in a world that is Truman Show like and having access to a variety of resources at their disposal - much more than they will ever need in their lifetimes.

The physics and economics and politics of the whole thing make no sense that is obvious.

Comedic moments are courtesy of a crazy neighbor that Matt moves next to in a town for small people.  The neighbor played by Christoph Waltz has some fun lines like - I am an asshole but we need them - else how will we get rid of all the shit? accompanying is what might pass for an anemic Calvin Klein model in the form of an Asian lady hitherto unknown playing the role of an emaciated Vietnamese with a peg leg.

On a side note I have been giving significant thought to what it might take to live a monastic lifestyle (of sorts) as I approach the curve where the child might find something to do at college.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...

Presumptive Society

Today's world is hyper connected.  I am not so sure what it means but you hear it a lot.  It is probably hyper but not sure how connected it is.  Sugar (fermented or not) is available in many ways than before and so getting hyper is easy.  It is probably more a threat than cocaine since it is sold legally. And what is this connected stuff?  Most people I encounter seem disconnected from reality.  So going back to this assumption that we are connected there are subtle and no so subtle instances of how brands and companies and middle men try to portray someone - A linkedin profile for somebody working for X years at a place advertises to the connected network that so and so is CELEBRATING X years @ Such and Such Inc. Do we know if (s)he is celebrating or cringing?  Perhaps a better way to portray will be - So and So LASTED X years @ such & such inc. Then it exhorts the readership to go ahead and congratulate them for this lasting effe...

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...