Skip to main content

Leonardo Da Vinci

Just finished reading the biography of the master by acclaimed writer Walter Isaacson.  Quite a reveal of the person who is admittedly recognized by many as the famous artist who painted the Mona Lisa.  The original sits in the French Louvre.

What is not known widely becomes the subject of this book including describing Leonardo's childhood in Vinci, Italy as an illegitimate offspring, who happens to be gay and left handed.

While he is readily recognized for his art, he is described as a polymath with wide array of skills that he developed through persistent observations of nature around him.

He moved between Florence and Milan, then two epicenters of trade and industry circa early 16th century.  While he worked in courts for royalty and noblemen of the times he also pitched his resume to a king claiming his skills at engineering and designing state of the art weapons.

His background working in theater led him to devise flying contraptions for the stage which he scaled to represent lifelike airplanes.  None of them actually saw production.

Other famous art work to his credit include the Vitruvian Man - a very bold and mathematically accurate depiction of a male body standing erect with arms outstretched perpendicular to the body.  This drawing was inscribed inside a circle which fits neatly into a square.

When in Italy last year we made it to the other very famed and almost destroyed painting inside a rectory of a famous church in Milan - The Last Supper or Cenacolo Vinciano


Santa Maria delle Grazie

Hard to see with naked eye - apparently Leonardo started the work with a nail to center the art work  - he hammered it where Jesus' forehead would be

Multiple years of restoration has resulted in this fresco being available to the public to view.  Originally commissioned by the Duke of Milan it was completed circa late 15th century.

He died at 67 in France in a house that a king bestowed to him to spend his waning years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

But What If We're Wrong?

I attempted to read this book by author Chuck Klosterman backward to forward but it started hurting my brain so I decided to stop and do it like any other publication in the English language.  Start from page 1 and move to the right. Witty, caustic and thought provoking this is a book you want to read if you believe that the status quo might, just might be wrong. At times bordering on being contrarian about most things around us it tries to zero in on the notion of what makes anything believable and certain in our minds.  The fact that there is a fact itself is ironic.  Something analogous to the idea that you can never predict the future because there is no future. Many books and movies have tried to play on this concept - best that I recollect (I think I am) was 'The Truman Show'.  This book by Klosterman attempts to provoke the reader to at least contemplate that what they think they know may be wrong. He uses examples like concept of gravity, and how it ...

You are important to us

Followed by piano music.   Followed by 'we are experiencing heavier than usual call volume'.  Sounds macabre like bleeding during menstruation or after a ghastly attack with a weapon on a hemophiliac.  Sorry Mrs. Johnson but it appears little Gertrude here has been bleeding heavier than usual what with her night time activities competing with the woodchucks in your neighborhood. Some services even go as far as to pick a random day to say - 'if you were to call us during the Chinese lunar month when the moon is axiomatically hugging the polar star with Jupiter intravenous when call volume is light'.  Well I will be damned.  I thought  I had checked with my astrologer before I placed this well focused call but  I guess this is what you get for listening to a quack. Umph! I am not sure which marketing genius came up with this personal touch concept of informing the caller that you are really a jackass for actually calling the customer serv...

Of Jims and Johns

Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...