Proliferation of cellular technology has made one thing very clear. Now you can actually count all the people who are bored witless. Think about it. Carriers and device sellers now boast of their circulation and subscriptions to garner an even larger share of the consuming public.
Large portion of the conversations or email exchange or game play or video watching that happens now is (although a function of improvement of technology), of no drastic new value add. Moreover the people observed with device attachment syndrome seem to now share their boredom with others in a similar mindset.
It has simply added to the chatter on the airwaves with meaningless advertisements and coupons and promotions to zombies that have nothing better to do than stare at the latest version of rectangular glass. More customers get to win grass seeds by planting a cyber bush or raking e-leaves with no clue on what actual raking entails.
In fact one could argue that quality of life has deteriorated to the extent that people are getting killed (ones texting and ones on the sidewalk - subtext) while indulging in mobile device based distractions.
Their quality of life has shifted from physical interaction to device based interaction making it monotonous and rude in some cases.
The net consumption per household has shifted from buying fruits (apples included) to spending on the next electronic apple (take that GDP proponents). There was a news article that suddenly highlighted the dilemma faced by these modern families where eating out (family time) has taken a backseat to spend on mobile communications.
So while I am not voting to bring back snail mail or investing in letter writing stationary stocks I do think that people ought to give boredom a chance and avoid cellular decay.
Here is another essay on the subject of first names. As in birth names. Or names provided to an offspring at birth. While the developed world tends to shy away from the exotic like Refrigerator or Coca Cola for their new production there is a plethora of Jims and Johns and Bobs or Robs. Speaking of which I do not think there is a categoric decision point at the time of birth if a child will be hereafter called as Bob. I mean have not yet met a toddler called Bob or Rob for that matter. At some point though the parental instinct to mouth out multiple syllables runs out and they switch from calling the crawler Robert to simply Robbie to Rob. Now speaking of - it is strange that the name sounds like something you would not want Rob to do - i.e. Rob anyone. Then why call someone that? After all Rob Peter to Pay Paul is not exactly a maxim to live a young life? Is it? Perhaps Peter or Paul might want to have a say in it? Then there is this matter of going to the John. Why degrad...
I recommend the book 'How To Be Idle' by Tom Hodgkinson. In defense of boredom, or idling, to be more precise.
ReplyDeletestraightly added to bucket..meanwhile I looked up his wiki which is humorous where it sites - His philosophy of the Idle Parent is very much in tune with Slow parenting, although with a more light-hearted self-interest in drinking and sex. Wonder if that is in reference to the kids or parents?
ReplyDelete